Last
time I told you that giving your people more than one conflict helps the reader
care about them. Usually one is more
personal than the other, although they can be related.
In
my plot class I talk about the secondary plot. In that context, let’s consider
the movie Die Hard. The big, obvious
conflict is between a cop – McLane - who wants to save a group of hostages, and
a terrorist whose true objective we don’t get to know until almost the end of
the film. But note that McLane is also wrestling with a more personal conflict
with his wife and we are not allowed to lose sight of that conflict throughout
the film. It’s easier for us to relate
to that more personal objective. That helps us relate to the character. Just like in Rocky (the example I used in a
previous blog) I have never wanted to get punched by a heavyweight champ but HAVE
wanted a woman to love and respect me, so that goal helps me relate to the
character.
Your
protagonist, and maybe your antagonist too, should also have internal
conflicts. It might be okay for your
villain to be willing to do whatever it takes to take over the world, get the
girl or win the race, but your protagonist should have to consider his response
to each challenge on a moral basis. Sure
he can save the hostage by shooting the bad guy in the head, sure he can find
the killer by lying to everyone about what he already knows, of course he can
get the girl by flattening the other fellow’s tire… but SHOULD he? Yes, many people like a totally confident
protagonist, and your story might work fine without internal conflict… but it
will be better with it.
Remember,
conflict is about character. In a good
novel, or movie for that matter, the protagonist will grow and change during
the story. It is the conflict that makes that change. Overcoming each challenge
forces our protagonist to show the strength, or determination, or quick wits we
want to see in a heroes, and the challenge the conflicts present force him to
change.